Home > Government, US > Some Thoughts on the US Federal Deficit

Some Thoughts on the US Federal Deficit

There’s been a lot of talk lately about the huge federal budget deficit. Along with that talk has been a lot of confusing and misleading information – accusations of “out of control spending” by the right and “millionaire tax cuts” by the left. But what do the actual numbers tell us?

There really are two stories to tell. The first is the short term problem of depressed tax revenue brought on by the Great Recession – not runaway spending. The second is the longer term problem of spending increases along with unfunded tax cuts. A look at the following graph shows this very clearly:

The red line shows federal government spending (expenditures), while the blue line shows tax revenues (receipts).

The short term deficit is clearly a result of the huge drop off in revenues that started in 2007 when the economy went into recession. There was a bump in spending due to the Stimulus Package which is estimated to have increased the debt by about $825B but revenues are the main issue – and revenues won’t return to their previous levels until the economy fully recovers. Unfortunately, as I will comment on in a future post, it could be a several years before that happens.

What’s also clear from this graph is that the longer term problems are the spending increases and tax cuts which began in 2001. In the years between 1995 and 2001 spending was kept in check while revenues grew – resulting in a few years of budget surpluses (Clinton with a GOP congress – a divided government success story!). Had those rates of spending and taxation been continued, the national debt would less than half of the current total and the government would be in surplus this year! Beginning in 2001, however, the rate of spending doubled to over 6% annually. This spending growth was significantly higher than GDP growth creating an unsustainable path destined to result in long term deficits. At the same time a series of tax cuts in 2001, 2003, 2004, 2008, 2009 and 2010 lowered tax revenues significantly. As a result, the effective tax rates today for all income levels are the lowest they’ve been in decades.

The CBO estimates that, since 2001, spending increases added $5.7T to the national debt and tax cuts added another $2.8T. Together, these two additions to the national debt account for more than half of today’s total.

In order to get back in balance, spending will either need to be cut drastically, or increases must be kept below GDP growth for several years. Considering the fragile state of the current economy, the latter choice would be preferable. Revenues will also need to return to higher levels. Most likely this will mean a tax increase in the not too distant future.

Categories: Government, US Tags: ,
  1. stephenhow
    December 2, 2011 at 10:46 pm

    The Economists at BaselineScenario.com make the same point on making the Bush tax cuts permanent, and our future solvency:
    The good news is they consider the tax cuts expiring as the realistic scenario, and we’ll be in good shape. If the GOP somehow convinces everyone it’s Socialism to repeal them, then we’re screwed (or Japan).

  2. December 20, 2011 at 6:07 pm

    For what its worth, I do not believe that we can tax our way back into prosperity. Nor can we save enough, actually. Since WWII, federal tax receipts have averaged 19% of GDP — almost completely independent of the actual tax rates (at least in the ranges we have seen them.) The only way to dig ourselves out of our debt is to grow the economy. Hence, a rational tax system will be one that promotes growth.

    But hey, what do I know — I’m just a dog.

    Corkie the Dog

  3. December 21, 2011 at 6:00 am

    Hey Corkie, how’s it going? I completely agree that growing the economy is the best way to solve the problem – and a large tax increase at this point would do more harm than good.

    However, tax revenues after the Bush tax cuts have been almost 2% of GDP less than they were before the tax cuts. Also, revenues fell more in the 2001 recession than they did in the much more severe 1981-1982 recession.


    I also agree in having a growth promoting tax system. I’ve wondered if the corporate income tax should be replaced with a VAT. I don’t know if the numbers work, but it would most certainly create jobs.

    As far as the Bush tax cuts are concerned, they don’t appear to have helped growth at all. If so, letting them expire probably wouldn’t hurt growth.


  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: